How the Koch brothers make their money – Seven Products Fueling the Brothers’ Right-Wing Agenda
The Nation, May 25, 2011
The brothers Charles and David Koch have long operated in the shadows of American business—David has even gone so far as to call their Koch Industries “the largest company that you’ve never heard of.” The libertarian brothers—who have had their hand in everything from the Citizens United Supreme Court decision to funding climate change deniers—have even taken their politics to the workplace, by proselytizing the benefits of unhindered capital to their own employees.
But the Kochs are only able to wield such outsized power in politics and public opinion because of the massive revenues they take in from their empire of products and services. We sent Nation intern Sara Jerving to a local supermarket to see just how many Koch products she could find hiding in plain sight on the store’s shelves.
Georgia-Pacific is a paper manufacturer that Koch Industries acquired in 2005. Beyond printer paper, building supplies and chemicals it offers under its own name, Georgia-Pacific also offers a wide array of consumer products, such as:
- Quilted Northern toilet paper
- Angel Soft toilet paper
- Brawny paper towels
- Sparkle paper towels
- Mardi Gras paper napkins
- Vanity Fair plates
- Dixie cup
But that’s not all: Koch Industries also profits from Cordura nylon, and Lycra fabric is produced by the Koch-owned textile company Invista. From ranching to fertilizers to chemicals and energy, the Koch brothers have their hands in a very wide range of goods and services. But though these products may seem bland, they’re putting billions of dollars into the coffers of one of this country’s most politically destructive corporations.
For more on the Koch brothers, read Mark Ames and Mike Elk’s recent report for The Nation, “Big Brothers: Thought Control at Koch.”
The long-term goal of Christians in politics should be to gain exclusive control over the franchise…Those who refuse to submit publicly must be denied citizenship
The long-term goal of Christians in politics should be to gain exclusive control over the franchise…Those who refuse to submit publicly must be denied citizenship
(NOTE: The following story mentions Roy Moore. This was written in 2005, so no longer is he looking to be Governor of Alabama, but may be in the running for the president of the USA in the 2012 election.)
A Nation Under God
Let others worry about the rapture: For the increasingly powerful Christian Reconstruction movement, the task is to establish the Kingdom of God right now from the courthouse to the White House. — By John Sugg December 2005 Issue
Reconstruction is the spark plug behind much of the battle over religion in politics today. The movement’s founder, theologian Rousas John Rushdoony, claimed 20 million followers—a number that includes many who embrace the Reconstruction tenets without having joined any organization. Card-carrying Reconstructionists are few, but their influence is magnified by their leadership in Christian right crusades, from abortion to homeschooling.
Reconstructionists also exert significant clout through front organizations and coalitions with other religious fundamentalists; Baptists, Anglicans, and others have deep theological differences with the movement, but they have made common cause with its leaders in groups such as the National Coalition for Revival. Reconstruction has slowly absorbed, congregation by congregation, the conservative Presbyterian Church in America (not to be confused with the progressive Presbyterian Church [USA]) and has heavily influenced others, notably the Southern Baptists.
George W. Bush has called Reconstruction-influenced theoretician Marvin Olasky “compassionate conservatism’s leading thinker,” and Olasky served as one of the president’s key advisers on the creation of the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. Bush also invited Reconstructionist Jack Hayford, a key figure in the Promise Keepers men’s group, to give the benediction at his first inaugural. Deposed House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, though his office won’t comment on his religious views, governs with what he calls a “biblical worldview”—one of Reconstruction’s signature phrases. And, for conspiracy buffs, two heavy contributors to the Chalcedon Foundation—Reconstruction’s main think tank—are Howard Ahmanson and Nelson Bunker Hunt, both of whose families played key roles in financing electronic voting machine manufacturer Election Systems & Software. Ahmanson is also a major sponsor of ultraconservative politicians, including California state legislator and 2003 gubernatorial candidate Tom McClintock.
Yet for all its influence, Reconstruction is almost invisible to the media and secular society. Atlanta is ground zero for most Reconstruction activity—home office to DeMar’s publishing house and home district to movement prophet Larry McDonald, who served four terms in Congress in the 1970s and 1980s—but the Atlanta Journal-Constitution has done only one major article on the movement. The entire Lexis-Nexis database includes only 43 articles from all of the U.S. media that make reference to Reconstruction, and only a handful of those explore the movement. “A hundred years ago, newspapers published the sermons preachers preached on Sunday,” notes Ed Larson, a University of Georgia historian. “Everyone knew what the Baptists believed, or the Lutherans or the Presbyterians. That’s no longer the case. And it has worked to the benefit of Reconstructionists as they doggedly pursued their goal.”
Reconstructionists aren’t shy about what exactly it is they are pursuing: “The long-term goal of Christians in politics should be to gain exclusive control over the franchise,” Gary North, a top Reconstruction theorist, wrote in his 1989 book, Political Polytheism: The Myth of Pluralism. “Those who refuse to submit publicly…must be denied citizenship.”
News & Politics Websites
ABAJournal – Law News Now published by the American Bar Association
Resource Directory for the New Apostolic Reformation a.k.a; Fundamentalist Conservative Christian Extremist Terrorists
War Is A Crime (formerly After Downing Street)
Atheism and Religion – News and Opinion
(Links Below Quotes)
‘I Believe in an America Where the Separation of Church and State is Absolute’
September 12, 1960, address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association.
BY: John F. Kennedy
While the so-called religious issue is necessarily and properly the chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election; the spread of Communist influence, until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Florida–the humiliating treatment of our President and Vice President by those who no longer respect our power–the hungry children I saw in West Virginia, the old people who cannot pay their doctor bills, the families forced to give up their farms–an America with too many slums, with too few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space.
These are the real issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious issues–for war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious barriers.
But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected President, the real issues in this campaign have been obscured–perhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once again–not what kind of church I believe in, for that should be important only to me–but what kind of America I believe in.
I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute–where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote–where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference–and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.
I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish–where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source–where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials–and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.
For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jew–or a Quaker–or a Unitarian–or a Baptist. It was Virginia’s harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson’s statute of religious freedom. Today I may be the victim–but tomorrow it may be you–until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great national peril.
Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end–where all men and all churches are treated as equal–where every man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice–where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind–and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood.
That is the kind of America in which I believe. And it represents the kind of Presidency in which I believe–a great office that must neither be humbled by making it the instrument of any one religious group nor tarnished by arbitrarily withholding its occupancy from the members of any one religious group. I believe in a President whose religious views are his own private affair, neither imposed by him upon the nation or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office.
I would not look with favor upon a President working to subvert the first amendment’s guarantees of religious liberty. Nor would our system of checks and balances permit him to do so–and neither do I look with favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI of the Constitution by requiring a religious test–even by indirection–for it. If they disagree with that safeguard they should be out openly working to repeal it.
I want a Chief Executive whose public acts are responsible to all groups and obligated to none–who can attend any ceremony, service or dinner his office may appropriately require of him–and whose fulfillment of his Presidential oath is not limited or conditioned by any religious oath, ritual or obligation.
This is the kind of America I believe in–and this is the kind I fought for in the South Pacific, and the kind my brother died for in Europe. No one suggested then that we may have a “divided loyalty,” that we did “not believe in liberty,” or that we belonged to a disloyal group that threatened the “freedoms for which our forefathers died.”
And in fact this is the kind of America for which our forefathers died–when they fled here to escape religious test oaths that denied office to members of less favored churches–when they fought for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom–and when they fought at the shrine I visited today, the Alamo. For side by side with Bowie and Crockett died McCafferty and Bailey and Carey–but no one knows whether they were Catholic or not. For there was no religious test at the Alamo.
I ask you tonight to follow in that tradition–to judge me on the basis of my record of 14 years in Congress–on my declared stands against an Ambassador to the Vatican, against unconstitutional aid to parochial schools, and against any boycott of the public schools (which I have attended myself)–instead of judging me on the basis of these pamphlets and publications we all have seen that carefully select quotations out of context from the statements of Catholic church leaders, usually in other countries, frequently in other centuries, and always omitting, of course, the statement of the American Bishops in 1948 which strongly endorsed church-state separation, and which more nearly reflects the views of almost every American Catholic.
I do not consider these other quotations binding upon my public acts–why should you? But let me say, with respect to other countries, that I am wholly opposed to the state being used by any religious group, Catholic or Protestant, to compel, prohibit, or persecute the free exercise of any other religion. And I hope that you and I condemn with equal fervor those nations which deny their Presidency to Protestants and those which deny it to Catholics. And rather than cite the misdeeds of those who differ, I would cite the record of the Catholic Church in such nations as Ireland and France–and the independence of such statesmen as Adenauer and De Gaulle.
But let me stress again that these are my views–for contrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for President. I am the Democratic Party’s candidate for President who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters–and the church does not speak for me.
Whatever issue may come before me as President–on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject–I will make my decision in accordance with these views, in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide otherwise.
But if the time should ever come–and I do not concede any conflict to be even remotely possible–when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do the same.
But I do not intend to apologize for these views to my critics of either Catholic or Protestant faith–nor do I intend to disavow either my views or my church in order to win this election.
If I should lose on the real issues, I shall return to my seat in the Senate, satisfied that I had tried my best and was fairly judged. But if this election is decided on the basis that 40 million Americans lost their chance of being President on the day they were baptized, then it is the whole nation that will be the loser, in the eyes of Catholics and non-Catholics around the world, in the eyes of history, and in the eyes of our own people.
But if, on the other hand, I should win the election, then I shall devote every effort of mind and spirit to fulfilling the oath of the Presidency–practically identical, I might add, to the oath I have taken for 14 years in the Congress. For without reservation, I can “solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution…so help me God.
“Religion is regarded by the common people as True, by the Wise as False, and by the Rulers as Useful.” ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca
“Religion is what keeps the poor from killing the rich.” ~ Napoleon Bonaparte
“In the history of the world, nothing has been the catalyst of more grief, hatred, war, and crime than religion. Religion allows a person to hate, kill, torture, or steal, while allowing him to recuse himself of all blame. Religion causes people to break the laws of ethics and morality in the name of a god.” (http://atheists.org/religion)
“The United States of America should have a foundation free from the influence of clergy.” ~ George Washington
“Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise.” – James Madison
“Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites.” ~ Thomas Jefferson
“The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter.” ~ Thomas Jefferson wrote, in a letter to John Adams (April 11, 1823)
“All national institutions of churches whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit. … My own mind is my own church.” ~ Thomas Paine ‘The Age of Reason (1794)’
“As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.” ~ Tripoli of Barbary. Art. 11. – Authored by American diplomat Joel Barlow in 1796, the following treaty was sent to the floor of the Senate, June 7, 1797, where it was read aloud in its entirety and unanimously approved. John Adams, having seen the treaty, signed it and proudly proclaimed it to the Nation.
“The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion”. ~ Thomas Paine
“The number, the industry, and the morality of the Priesthood and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the Church and the State.” ~ James Madison a.k.a. ‘The Father of the Constitution of the United States of America
PLEASE WATCH THE FOLLOWING DVDS, THEY EXPOSE THE HISTORY OF WHAT HAPPENS WHEN RELIGION GETS TOO INTERTWINED WITH POLITICS:
‘Imagine If All Atheists Left America’: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbef07aQtB8
‘Constantines Sword’: http://www.ConstantinesSword.com
‘Theologians Under Hitler’: http://www.vitalvisuals.com/?q=node/19
‘The God Who Wasn’t There’: http://www.TheGodMovie.com/
‘A brief rundown of the cost in human lives exacted by religion and religious warfare’: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lq0oMhR3OgI
“The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense founded on the Christian religion – Many Religious Right activists have attempted to rewrite history by asserting that the United States government derived from Christian foundations, that our Founding Fathers originally aimed for a Christian nation. This idea simply does not hold to the historical evidence. Of course many Americans did practice Christianity, but so also did many believe in deistic philosophy. Indeed, most of our influential Founding Fathers, although they respected the rights of other religionists, held to deism and Freemasonry tenets rather than to Christianity”: http://www.nobeliefs.com/Tripoli.htm
PLEASE SUPPORT ORGANIZATION WHO FIGHT FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. HERE ARE A FEW I HAVE SUPPORTED FOR YEARS:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State: http://www.au.org/
Freedom From Religion Foundation: http://ffrf.org/
Military Religious Freedom Foundation: http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/
The Interfaith Alliance Foundation: http://www.interfaithalliance.org/
IMAGINE IF ALL THE ATHEISTS LEFT AMERICA:
Highlighting what would happen if all atheists were to leave America. Details of who would leave, what would change, and a look at other countries with virtually no Atheism.
Over 10% of American population are atheist: http://www.atheistempire.com/reference/stats/index.php
Less than 0.25% of prisoners are atheist: http://holysmoke.org/icr-pri.htm
Majority of Nobel Prize winners atheist: The Religiosity and Religious Affiliation of Nobel Prize Winners (Beit-Hallahmi, 1989)
Majority of University professors atheist: Religion and Spirituality among University Scientists (Ecklund, 2007)
Majority of scientists atheist: http://freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Scientists_and_atheism
Atheist Celebrities: http://www.celebatheists.com/?title=Main_Page
Poverty rate lower among atheists: Society Without God (Zuckerman, 2008)
IQ higher among atheists: http://www.interfaith.org/2008/06/20/study-links-atheism-to-high-iq/
Illiteracy rate lower among atheists: United Nations Human Development Report (2004)
Average Income higher among atheists: United Nations Human Development Report (2004)
Divorce rate lower among atheists: http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm
Teen pregnancy rate lower among atheists: http://www.americablog.com/2009/01/red-states-dominate-teen-pregnancy.html
Abortions lower among atheists: Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies: A First Look (Paul, 2005): http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
STD infection lower among atheists: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article571206.ece
Crime rate lower among atheists: Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies: A First Look (Paul, 2005): http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
Homicide rate lower among atheists: Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies: A First Look (Paul, 2005): http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
Percentage of atheists in the countries mentioned: http://www.adherents.com
The Apologetics Index is a ‘family of web sites’ provides 42,850+ pages of research resources on religious cults, sects, new religious movements, alternative religions, apologetics-, anticult-, and countercult organizations, doctrines, religious practices and world views. These resources reflect a variety of theological and/or sociological perspectives.
Christian relief – blog A blog recording missionary exploitation of relief or people under distress
Resource Directory for the New Apostolic Reformation a.k.a; Fundamentalist Conservative Christians
SkepticMoney.com Atheism, Skepticism and Money
At Nuremberg, April 18th, 1946
Saturday, 8 Mar 2003. His last days, and his thoughts on the war. By Charles Mauch.
Hermann Göring, Nazi Reichmarshall and Luftwaffe-Chief was a reviled twentieth-century figure associated with the most chilling example of genocide in human history. Göring was one of the highest-ranking Nazis who survived to be captured and put on trial for war crimes in the city of Nuremberg by the Allies after the end of World War II. He was found guilty on charges of “war crimes,” “crimes against peace,” and “crimes against humanity” by the Nuremberg tribunal and sentenced to death by hanging. The sentence could not be carried out, however, because Göring committed suicide with smuggled cyanide capsules hours before his execution, scheduled for 15 October 1946.
Görings last days were spent with Gustave Gilbert, a German-speaking intelligence officer and psychologist who was granted free access by the Allies to all the prisoners held in the Nuremberg jail. Gilbert kept a journal of his observations of the proceedings and his conversations with the prisoners, which he later published in the book Nuremberg Diary.
During the conversation, Gilbert recorded Göring’s observations that the common people can always be manipulated into supporting and fighting wars by their political leaders:
We got around to the subject of war again and I said that, contrary to his attitude, I did not think that the common people are very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction.
“Why, of course, the people don’t want war,” Göring shrugged. “Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.”
“There is one difference,” I pointed out. “In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.”
“Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
updated August 2010
There are many “kinds of”, “types” or “branches” of all political parties. Same holds true for Socialism. This list contains a small portion of information you can find covering Socialism
“Socialism offers the best environment for democracy to fully flourish because it sharply limits the power of corporations to dominate politics and the economy. Socialism’s democratic potential can only be realized, however, if broad sections of the people are wholeheartedly engaged inevery aspect of society’s decision-making processes.” (Communist Party USA – http://www.cpusa.org/faq/)
A to Z of Socialism – http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/issue.php?issue=346#3az
ABC of Socialism – http://www.sa.org.au/abc-of-socialism
Arguing for socialism A collection of articles and talks by Dave Holmes – http://dave-holmes.blogspot.com/
How Socialists Built America by John Nichols – http://www.thenation.com/article/159929/how-socialists-built-america
Socialist Politics 101 – Socialist Action: http://www.socialistaction.org/kit.htm
What Socialists Stand For – Vote Socialist Action: http://votesocialistaction.wordpress.com/what-socialists-stand-for/
Obama’s No Socialist. I Should Know: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/13/AR2009031301899.html
A Socialist Talks About Obama: http://www.socialistwebzine.org/2010/10/socialist-talks-about-obama.html
Is Obama A Socialist? Not if You Ask One: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28645
Obama is not a socialist: http://www.thedmonline.com/obama-is-not-a-socialist-1.899275
List of left-wing articles critical of Barack Obama- http://eng.anarchopedia.org/List_of_Left-Wing_articles_critical_of_Obama
Obama….Socialism? Hardly, Say Socialists – http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2009/db20090522_329825.htm
Ask the card-carrying socialists: Is Obama one of them? – http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/14/Obama.socialist/index.html
What Socialism looks like: http://correspondents.theatlantic.com/conor_clarke/2009/06/what_socialism_looks_like.php
The Nation and “socialism”: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/apr2009/pers-a02.shtml
What is Democratic Socialism (1): http://www.ydsusa.org/What_is_Democratic_Socialism
What is Democratic Socialism (2): http://www.dsausa.org/pdf/widemsoc.pdf
What is Democratic Socialism (3): http://www.theactivist.org/ydsusa/node/6
What is socialism: http://www.isreview.org/issues/65/feat-socialism.shtml
What is socialism? – http://peppsl.convio.net/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5125
What Socialism is Not – Seven Common Misconceptions about Socialism – http://torchandrose.socialdemocratsusa.org/webed/vol1issue01.shtml#article2
Why Socialism? Democratic ownership and management of society’s wealth – http://www.socialist-alliance.org/page.php?page=817
The Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Labor Archives at New York University: http://www.nyu.edu/library/bobst/research/tam/index.html
Towards Freedom: The Theory and Practice of Democratic Socialism: http://www.ydsusa.org/toward_ds.html
The S. Word, Socialism, Comes Out of the Closet: http://www.alternet.org/workplace/130365/
Red State Socialism and the Politics of Stimulus: http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/001439.htm
Republican Sarah Palin enthusiastically practices socialism, Alaska-style: http://www.adn.com/opinion/story/581484.html
Republican Rep. Bachmann’s clinic takes in thousands from “socialized medicine”: http://www.americanindependent.com/bachmann%E2%80%99s-clinic-takes-in-thousands-from-%E2%80%9Csocialized-medicine%E2%80%9D/
Alaska Republican-Tea Party Senate candidate Joe Miller admits taking farm subsidies: http://alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/politics/6880-alaska-senate-candidate-joe-miller-admits-taking-farm-subsidies
Joe Miller also relied on technicalities to obtain a low-income hunting and fishing license from the state of Alaska: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/homeowning-lawyer-joe-miller-sought-low-income-hunting-and-fishing-license-in-alaska.php
Joe Miller also thinks federal unemployment insurance is constitutionally questionable. But it turns out his wife benefited from it in the early part of the decade — after she left a job working for him: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/joe-millers-wife-received-unemployment-benefits-miller-called-not-constitutionally-authorized.php
Anti-Government Tea Partier Conservative Christian Sharron Angle Gets Health Care from the Federal Government: http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/28/anti-government-tea-partier-sharron-angle-gets-health-care-from-the-federal-government/
The Most Hypocritical States are Usually “Red”: http://www.thedailybeast.com/galleries/2193/1/?newsmaker=109&redirectURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Fgalleries%2Fnewsmaker%2Fpolitics%2F
Despite Saying Government Intervention Puts Industry In A ‘Coma,’ Raese’s Biz Takes Millions In Taxpayer Funds – http://thinkprogress.org/2010/10/25/raese-government-contracts/
Socialist Party USA: http://socialistparty-usa.org/
History of Socialism in the U.S.A.: http://www.cpusa.org/article/static/758/
Socialism is not Communism: http://www.dsausa.org/dl/Winter_2009.pdf
Nine Myths about Socialism in the US – http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25187.htm
Socialism – Wikipedia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
Why Are We Afraid of Saying “Socialism”? – http://www.alternet.org/vision/146143/
Set the Record Straight project – http://www.ThisIsCommunism.org
From the Arsenal of Marxism: Archived Writings on the Foundations of Socialism – http://socialistviewpoint.org/arsenal.html
“Socialism is not part of the two party system of democrats or republicans. Socialism has its own left and right wings and any researcher worth their weight should know this basic fact.” – http://www.americansocialistvoter.org/
SOCIALIST PARTIES & ORGANIZATIONS:
American Party of Labor – http://www.americanpartyoflabor.org/
The Citizen – A Charter for 21st Century Socialism – http://www.thecitizen.org.uk/
Committee for a Workers’ International – http://www.socialistworld.net/
Communist League – Worker’s Communist Party of the USA – http://www.communistleague.us/
Communist Party of Great Britain – http://www.cpgb.org.uk/
Communist Party, USA – http://www.cpusa.org/
Communist Students U.K. – http://communiststudents.org.uk
Democratic Socialists of America – http://www.dsausa.org/ DSA is the largest US affiliate of the Socialist International (SI),( http://www.socialistinternational.org/) the worldwide organization of 140 socialist, social democratic and labor parties. The SI has the distinction of being the largest political organization in the world.
Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO) – http://www.frso.org/
Freedom Socialist Party – http://www.socialism.com/
International Bolshevik Tendency – http://www.bolshevik.org/
International Committee of the Fourth International – World Socialist Web Site – http://www.wsws.org/
International Communist League (Fourth Internationalist) http://www.icl-fi.org/
International Socialists Austrailia – http://www.solidarity.net.au/
International Socialist Group, UK – http://www.isg-fi.org.uk/
International Socialist Organization – http://www.internationalsocialist.org/
International Socialist Tendency – http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/entries/ist.htm
The International Students for Social Equality – http://www.intsse.com/
International Workers League (Fourth International) http://www.litci.org/Ingles/InicialIN.aspx
Internationalist Group in the United States – http://www.internationalist.org/
League for the Fifth International – http://www.fifthinternational.org/
League for the Fourth International / Internationalist Group USA – http://www.internationalist.org/
League For Industrial Democracy – http://industrialdemocracy.org/
New Communist Party of Britain – http://www.newworker.org/
Party for Socialism and Liberation – http://www.psl.org/
Projet-K – http://www.projet-k.org/ A european network of critical marxist journals
The Revolutionary Communist Party, USA – http://www.revcom.us/
The Revolutionary Internationalist Movement – http://www.revcom.us/s/corim.htm
Socialist Action – http://www.socialistaction.org
Socialist Alternative – http://www.socialistalternative.org/
Socialist Appeal – http://www.socialistappeal.org/
Socialist Democrats Socialist Party of USA – http://www.socialdemocratsusa.org
Socialist Democrats – USA – http://sd21c.org/index.html
Socialist Equality Party http://www.wsws.org/sections/category/icfi/sepuscat.shtml
Socialist International – http://www.socialistinternational.org/
Socialist Labor Party of America – http://www.slp.org/
Socialist Party of Great Britain – World Socialism – http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/
Socialist Party U.K. – http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/
Socialist Party of America – 1901-1972, 2007-present – http://www.thesocialistparty.net/
Socialist Party, U.S.A. – http://www.sp-usa.org/
Socialist Solidarity Network – http://www.socialistsolidarity.com/
Socialist World – http://www.socialistworld.net/
The United Socialist Movement of The Americas – http://www.usma.ca/
USA – The Socialist Equality Party is the name of several political parties, all members of the International Committee of the Fourth International – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Committee_of_the_Fourth_International
Working-class Internationalism & Organization – (See below) – http://www.marxists.org/history/international/index.htm
Worker’s Communist Party of the USA – Communist League – http://www.communistleague.us/
Workers Democracy Network USA – http://www.workersdemocracy.org/
Workers International – http://www.workersinternational.org/
The Workers’ League becomes the Socialist Equality Party http://www.wsws.org/sections/category/icfi/wlsep.shtml
Workers World Party – http://www.workers.org/
The World Socialist Movement – http://www.worldsocialism.org/
World Socialist Web Site – International Committee of the Fourth International – http://www.wsws.org/
Young Communist League USA – http://www.yclusa.org/
Young People’s Socialist League http://www.ypsl.org/
Young Social Democrats–Young Peoples’ Socialist League – http://youngpeoplessocialistleague.org/
American Rights At Work – http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/
American Socialists – http://www.americansocialists.net/
American Socialist Voter – http://www.americansocialistvoter.com/
Association for Union Democracy http://www.uniondemocracy.com/
Bob Avakian, leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA: http://www.bobavakian.net/
Center for Economic Research and Social Change – http://cersc.org/
Committee For Workers’ International – http://www.socialistworld.net/
The Faith and Socialism Commission http://www.faithandsocialism.org/
Freedom Socialist Party (FSP), USA, Canada, Australia http://www.socialism.com/
International Socialist Organization – http://www.internationalsocialist.org/
Labor.Net – http://www.labornet.org/
Labor Standard USA http://www.laborstandard.org/
Left Parties of the World – http://www.geocities.com/bivernico/
News & Letters Committees USA – http://www.newsandletters.org/
People’s Weekly World http://www.pww.org/
Political Affairs http://www.politicalaffairs.net/
Protest.Net – http://protest.net/
Radicals at Work – http://radicalsatwork.org/
‘Revolution’ newspaper, voice of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA: http://www.revcom.us/
Socialist Action – http://www.socialistaction.org/
Socialist Alliance – http://www.socialistalliance.org/
Socialist Alternative – http://www.socialistalternative.org/
Socialist Central Committee – http://www.scc-asp.org/socialist_agenda.html
Socialist History Project, Canada – http://www.socialisthistory.ca/
Socialist Organizer – http://www.theorganizer.org/
Socialist Project, Canada – http://www.socialistproject.ca/
Social Resistance – http://www.socialistresistance.net/
Socialist Solidarity Network – http://www.socialistsolidarity.com/
Socialist Viewpoint – http://socialistviewpoint.org/
Socialist Workers Party – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Workers_Party_%28UK%29
The Marxist-Leninist – http://marxistleninist.wordpress.com/
Venezuela Solidarity – http://venezuelasolidarity.org/
World Socialist Website – http://www.wsws.org/ The online news and information center of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI), its affiliated parties are called the Socialist Equality Party http://www.wsws.org/sections/category/icfi/sepuscat.shtml .
World Wide Class Solidarity – http://www.workers.org/
Youth for Socialist Action – http://www.socialistaction.org/ysa.htm
ComInterNet: Listing of World Communist & Workers Parties – http://www.angelfire.com/la/cominternet/
Community Labor News – http://www.clnews.org/
International Journal of Socialist Renewal – “LINKS” – http://links.org.au/
International Socialist Tendency – http://www.istendency.net/
League for the Revolutionary Party (LRP), USA http://www.lrp-cofi.org/
Leftist Parties of the World – http://www.broadleft.org/
Jays Leftist and Progressive Internet Resource Directory – http://www.jaysleftist.info/ Revolutionary Communist League – can refer to one of several different parties – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Communist_League
Socialism links and addresses world wide – http://www.socialistworld.net/index.php?m=5
Trotskyist League USA http://www.laborstandard.org/
Vote Socialist – http://www.votesocialist.org/
World Socialist Web Site – http://wsws.org/ – Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) (http://www.wsws.org/sections/category/icfi/icfi.shtml ) . Its affiliated parties are called the Socialist Equality Party and have sections and supporters throughout the world. It is well known for its publication of the World Socialist Web Site.
The Workers’ League becomes the Socialist Equality Party – http://www.wsws.org/sections/category/icfi/wlsep.shtml
Action Without Theory – http://action-without-theory.blogspot.com/
Left Central – http://leftcentral.wordpress.com/
Power to the People – http://power-2-people.blogspot.com/
Socialist Agenda – http://socialistagenda.wordpress.com/
Socialist Democrats Socialist Party of USA blog – http://socialdemocratsusa.blogspot.com/
Socialist Unity – http://www.socialistunity.com/
The Marxist – Leninist – http://marxistleninist.wordpress.com/
MEDIA, MAGAZINES, NEWS, etc:
21st Century Socialism – http://21stcenturysocialism.com/
The Communist Monthly – http://www.communistleague.us/tcm/index.html is a theoretical supplement included with Working People’s Advocate http://www.communistleague.us/wpa/index.html , the monthly voice and Central Organ of the Central Committee of the Communist League http://www.communistleague.us/
Communist Voice (USA) – http://home.flash.net/~comvoice
Haymarket Books – http://www.haymarketbooks.org/
International Socialism – http://www.isj.org.uk/ A quarterly journal of socialist theory
International Viewpoint – http://internationalviewpoint.org/ News and analysis from the ‘Fourth International’ http://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article351, which is not the same as International Workers League (Fourth International) http://www.litci.org/Ingles/InicialIN.aspx
Left Turn (USA) – http://www.leftturn.org/ A collectively-run left-wing magazine, published in the United States
The Militant – http://www.themilitant.com Socialist Workers’ Party (SWP) periodical, USA
Morning Star- http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/
The Organizer http://socialistparty-usa.org/theorganizer An irregularly produced newsletter from the Socialist Party USA National Office http://socialistparty-usa.org/natl-office/index.html and Edited by Greg Pason, the National Secretary
Radical Philosophy – http://www.radicalphilosophy.com/
Revolution – http://www.internationalist.org/revolutiontoc.html – Publication of the Internationalist Clubs – (http://www.internationalist.org/) and the Revolutionary Reconstruction Club at the City University of New York (http://www.campusactivism.org/displaygroups-329.htm)
Socialist Action newspaper – http://www.socialistaction.org/paper.htm
The Socialist magazine http://www.socialistparty-usa.org/socialist/
Socialist Review – http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/
Socialist Review and International Socialism Journal Index – http://www.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/
Socialist Standard – Magazine for The World Socialist Movement – http://www.worldsocialism.org
Socialist Voice http://www.socialistvoice.ca
Socialist View Point – http://www.socialistviewpoint.org/
Socialist Women http://www.socialistparty-usa.org/socialistwomen/
SocialistWorker.org – http://socialistworker.org/ – The Web site for Socialist Worker, a national newspaper founded in 1977 and published by the International Socialist Organization http://www.internationalsocialist.org/.
Socialist Worker Online, UK – http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/
Union Democracy Review http://www.uniondemocracy.com/UDR/UDRhome.htm Bi-monthly publication of the Association for Union Democracy http://www.uniondemocracy.com/, reports on struggles for union democracy.
Weekly Worker – http://www.cpgb.org.uk/ website of the Communist Party of Great Britain
Workers Library Series http://www.communistleague.us/lit/wls.html In conjunction with the Albert Currlin Institute for the Study of Working People’s History, the Communist League http://www.communistleague.us/ is proud to present the Workers Library Series, a 31-volume series of the classics of communist literature.
Workers’ Republic http://www.communistleague.us/wr/index.html The quarterly political journal of the Communist League http://www.communistleague.us/ , containing League Bulletins and statements, theoretical and analytical articles and exchanges with other self-described socialists and communists.
President John F. Kennedy on being a liberal…
“I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party creed or set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man’s ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves
I believe also in the United States of America, in the promise that it contains and has contained throughout our history of producing a society so abundant and creative and so free and responsible that it cannot only fulfill the aspirations of its citizens, but serve equally well as a beacon for all mankind. I do not believe in a superstate. I see no magic in tax dollars which are sent to Washington and then returned. I abhor the waste and incompetence of large-scale federal bureaucracies in this administration as well as in others. I do not favor state compulsion when voluntary individual effort can do the job and do it well. But I believe in a government which acts, which exercises its full powers and full responsibilities. Government is an art and a precious obligation; and when it has a job to do, I believe it should do it.And this requires not only great ends but that we propose concrete means of achieving them.
Our responsibility is not discharged by announcement of virtuous ends. Our responsibility is to achieve these objectives with social invention, with political skill, and executive vigor. I believe for these reasons that liberalism is our best and only hope in the world today. For the liberal society is a free society, and it is at the same time and for that reason a strong society. Its strength is drawn from the will of free people committed to great ends and peacefully striving to meet them. Only liberalism, in short, can repair our national power, restore our national purpose, and liberate our national energies.
What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label “Liberal?” If by “Liberal” they mean, as they want people to believe, someone who is soft in his policies abroad, who is against local government, and who is unconcerned with the taxpayer’s dollar, then the record of this party and its members demonstrate that we are not that kind of “Liberal.” But if by a “Liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “Liberal,” then I’m proud to say I’m a “Liberal.”
~ Presidental candidate John Fitzgerald Kennedy
On Sept. 12, 1960, presidential candidate John F. Kennedy gave a major speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association, a group of Protestant ministers, on the issue of his religion. At the time, many Protestants questioned whether Kennedy’s Roman Catholic faith would allow him to make important national decisions as president independent of the church. Kennedy addressed those concerns before a skeptical audience of Protestant clergy. Full text online avaiable at Wikisource and here